Home Reviews Don't Be SYSsy

Search

Don't Be SYSsy PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 
Thursday, 24 December 2009 15:26

Anyone who’s ever worked with me knows that I have several weaknesses. One of them is extra sensitivity to things that reside under sys (global.sys) in Specman/e. If this is Chinese to you then you’re probably a SystemVerilog guy: "sys" is the top most e struct (class) and the one struct people should strive NOT to use. The only thing that should be placed there is your own top unit, preferably customized to your project needs.

 

So the reason why people would want to use sys to place methods or other fields in the first place is because it’s accessible from everywhere, which is extremely convenient. But methodology-wise it would not be the smartest thing to do. Let me tell you why:

1. If you were the only verifier in your project then I would let you slip away. But since this is not the situation in most of the cases - you might get contentions on struct member names.

2. Placing code under sys encourages the use of full e paths rather than pointers and ports - code integration becomes a big mess this way, trust me.

3. Additional instances of your env is impossible because you can’t instantiate sys - no reuse.

4. You won’t be able to use your environment in a larger context because it’s not tightly encapsulated - no scalability.

5. There’s no logical distinction between the various elements, everything under the same struct - very hard to maintain

With all that being said - sometimes we need a speedy action and using sys could be a quick and dirty solution - that’s ok. But as a general guideline, unless you have a really good reason, don’t be syssy, create your own top level struct/unit, and use self-contained components.

 

 
More articles :

» Prepare For Your Next Job Interview

Succeeding at job interviews requires practice. If you're applying for a verification job you'd better get yourself well prepared both mentally and technically. Nevertheless, a great deal of tension could be avoided if you knew in advance what sort...

» Progressive Coverage

Progressive Coverage is a method of coverage collection that’s highly applicable in communication devices, but may as well be applied elsewhere. Now before I start to babble about my philosophy on coverage collection why don't I just give you an...

» To Randomize Or Not To Randomize

One of my former colleagues once revealed the fact that she had no less than 70 pairs of shoes. That’s right, seventy! She had been very good at her job and by no means had any plans to start her own shoe business so I asked myself why on earth...

» Latest Buzz From The EDA & Verification Community

{loadposition pos101}{loadposition pos102}{loadposition pos103}{loadposition pos104}{loadposition pos105}{loadposition pos106}{loadposition pos107}{loadposition pos108}{loadposition pos109}{loadposition pos110}{loadposition pos111}{loadposition...

» Another Step Forward For VMM

While the move from 1.0 to 1.1 and its later flavors did not involve a major paradigm shift, VMM1.2 (beta) introduces several fundamentally new concepts that you should be aware of. Some of the new concepts are the natural result of an evolving...

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Copyright © 2018 Think Verification - Tips & Insights on ASIC Verification. All Rights Reserved.
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.